Mommy … Er, Daddy?
9-pound, 5-ounce Susan Juliette Beatie was born a few weeks ago. That name likely means nothing to you. But it means a whole helluva lot for Thomas Beatie, the man who gave birth to her.
In case you haven’t yet heard the story - and that would be surprising, given that it’s been a feature in many magazines, newspapers, and TV shows - Thomas Beatie was born a woman, but legally became a man ten years ago, opting for top surgery (removal of the breasts) and testosterone treatments. He did not, however, mess around at all with his reproductive organs because he knew he wanted to have a child one day.
“It’s not a male or female desire to have a child. It’s a human desire,” Beatie said in an interview on Oprah. And after a perfectly normal pregnancy, Beatie got his wish.
Of course, something like this is bound to spark off huge debates about “naturalness” and morality. Take a look at some of the comments I’ve found:
“I think if he wanted to have a baby, he should have stayed a woman, this is nothing but, a drama queen wanting attention. What is this going to prove to his unborn child?”
“This is not a man, it is a woman who is pretending to be a man. She has a vagina, not a penis or any facsimile there of, she cannot produce sperm she is a woman who wants to look like a man.”
“THIS IS STILL BIOLOGICALLY A WOMAN!!! SHE still has her womanly parts!! If this person wanted to truly be a man SHE would have had the complete sex change.”
“The person in question is very much a FEMALE, with female reproductive organs in place. So nothing much worth making a noise…. Females do get pregnant…. don’t they ?”
And, straight from the MSNBC newsroom: “I’m gonna be sick. I am going to be sick … If he’s the mother, who’s the father?” and “That was not only stupid and useless, but, quite frankly, disgusting.”
I’m not going to lie: it’s extremely difficult to find any positive quotes about this except from the parents themselves and, well, Oprah.
Now, from my perspective, as a supporter of the whole gay marriage/parenting thing, I have no doubt that Beatie and his wife (as they are legally married as a man and a woman) have the potential to be wonderful parents. However, I’m wondering how this is going to affect the gay parenting movement in the long run. I’m also a little confused as to how a woman who feels as though she is inherently a man, and has gone through lengths to create a pseudo-masculine body and become legally recognized as a male, considers giving birth to a child as not having any effect on her supposed male inclinations. Men - that is, men who were born male - do not naturally have a supposed need to carry and give birth to children; at least, this is the case with every man I have known.
I don’t know; I guess I’m just a little befuddled by this whole thing. I’m glad the child is healthy and that the parents are ecstatic about the new addition to their family, and, contrary to many right-wing fanatics, I’m sure the child will grow up and mature into a properly-functioning adult, but even in this relatively open-minded era, this all seems a bit too ‘out there,’ even for me.
I had the pleasure of meeting Lauryn from the latest installment of 

